Skip to main content
Link to Walkers homepage

BVI Commercial Court provides helpful guidance on the function of ancillary claims in a complex dispute concerning Lunan Pharmaceutical Group Limited

Jun 2, 2022

Advisory
A sleek black pen with 'Walkers' branding lies atop a closed notebook, both featuring raised 'Walkers' logos.

Key Takeaways

  • Walkers has secured a further victory for its client, Ms. Zhao Long, in a complex dispute regarding the ownership of shares in a significant PRC pharmaceutical company in a further judgment of the British Virgin Islands Commercial Court 

  • The latest judgment in the proceedings provides helpful guidance on the circumstances in which an ancillary claim can be brought and the jurisdictional hurdles and evidential issues that may arise in pursuing an ancillary claim. 

  • The case demonstrates the BVI Court’s ability to efficiently adjudicate complex commercial disputes tracing PRC assets and provides helpful guidance on how to adapt proceedings following asset dissipation by initiating an ancillary claim. 
Walkers has secured a further victory for its client, Ms. Zhao Long, in a complex dispute regarding the ownership of shares in a significant PRC pharmaceutical company in a further judgment of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) Commercial Court demonstrating the BVI Court’s ability to adjudicate complex cross-border commercial disputes tracing PRC assets.

The latest judgment in the proceedings provides helpful guidance on the circumstances in which an ancillary claim can be brought and the jurisdictional hurdles and evidential issues that may arise in pursuing an ancillary claim:

  • Ancillary claims must fall within the parameters for such claims set out in Part 18 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court Civil Procedure Rules (the “EC CPR”) and are most commonly a counterclaim initiated by a defendant against another party to the proceedings. Where an ancillary claim does fall within the parameters of EC CPR Part 18, the Court can exercise its discretion to dismiss ancillary claims pursuant to EC CPR 18.10 in particular having regard to whether there is a close connection between the ancillary claim and the original claim.
  • Where a claimant applies to amend its pleadings to add a fresh cause of action against a foreign defendant who only appears because of service out of the jurisdiction, the Court should consider whether the fresh cause of action passes through one of the gateways for service out of jurisdiction. In contrast, where a defendant (in this case an ancillary defendant) voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction, by doing so they were submitting to the risk that another party might raise a counterclaim (including in the form of an ancillary claim).
  • A prior judgment can be admitted as evidence and relied upon as regards its findings of fact in a subsequent claim (including an ancillary claim) in circumstances where the subsequent claim is between parties involved in the earlier proceedings and before the same judge that determined the prior judgment.

Click to view advisory

Authors

John Crook

John Crook

Partner/Hong Kong

T/+852 2596 3344
M/+852 9222 5797
E/Email John Crook
More articles from this author View profile
Adam Hinks

Adam Hinks

Partner/Singapore

T/+65 6603 1657
M/+65 8112 1173
E/Email Adam Hinks
More articles from this author View profile
Luke Petith

Luke Petith

Partner/Dubai

T/+971 4 363 7926
M/+971 54 492 3553
E/Email Luke Petith
More articles from this author View profile

Vivian Kwan

Senior Associate/Hong Kong

T/+852 2596 3413
M/+852 6051 8961
E/Email Vivian Kwan
More articles from this author View profile

Get the latest insights and expertise in your inbox 

Fluid ink image
Sign up
logo footer

Connect with us

FacebookFacebook
InstagramInstagram
LinkedInLinkedIn

Employee login

Self Service Password ResetWalkers AnywhereWalkers Sharefile
Legal notices/Cookies policy

All rights reserved - © 2025 Walkers Global