Nick Vernon
Partner
Bermuda
The Government's proposal is stated to be aimed at reducing wage gaps linked to gender, race and ethnicity by ensuring greater openness around how pay is determined.
Although employment law in Bermuda already prohibits discriminatory pay for substantially similar work, the Government believes that the existing framework is largely reactive and complaint-driven whereas, it says, the proposed pay transparency legislation is intended to prevent problems before they occur.
It should be said that Bermuda is far from alone in moving in this direction. Similar pay transparency measures have been or are being introduced in Canada and other jurisdictions, including across the EU with the EU Pay Transparency Directive coming into effect in June 2026, with requirements ranging from salary disclosures to gender pay gap reporting and equal pay certification via independent audits.
While Bermuda’s proposal is more tailored to a small jurisdiction, it reflects the same international trend – employers will need to adopt documented, explainable and defensible pay systems.
Although draft legislation has not yet been published, a number of proposed measures are outlined in the Bermuda Government's policy proposal, which include:
It is not known at this stage whether any measures that get brought into law will be enacted by way of new legislation or as amendments to Bermuda's existing Employment Act 2000.
It will likely be a number of months before any legislation is enacted. However, the direction of travel is clear – employers in Bermuda should prepare to adopt more transparent pay practices. Some businesses will inevitably find this more challenging than others, but there are some preliminary steps that employers can start to take.
A sensible first step is for employers to carry out a high level review of their existing pay structures. Are there clear salary bands for roles, or have pay differences developed over time? Can current pay levels, for employees performing similar work, be objectively explained if challenged? How easy will it be for the organisation to actually analyse its pay data?
Job descriptions could also be reviewed as clear, up to date descriptions that accurately reflect the responsibilities and requirements of each role are likely to underpin defensible pay decisions and make transparency far easier to manage.
Recruitment practices will also likely warrant attention. Employers should consider whether they are ready to include salary ranges in job advertisements and whether interview processes rely, formally or informally, on an applicant’s salary history.
Finally, employers will need to consider how pay information is documented and communicated. If pay decisions are challenged, employers will need to demonstrate how and why particular decisions were made.
The Government is currently seeking feedback on its policy proposal from the public, employees, employers and industry stakeholders. The window for submitting feedback closes on 31 May 2026, following which we can expect to learn more detail on the pay transparency requirements facing employers in Bermuda.
Authors
Key contacts