Fundamentals 2021

Please join us on Tuesday 9 November for a live broadcast of Walkers Fundamentals where we will explore the latest trends in Investment Funds.

Read More

Walkers Launches Online AML Training Solution in Bermuda

Walkers Professional Services has announced that it has launched an innovative e-Learning Anti-Money Laundering Training platform in Bermuda.

Learn More

Walkers Expands Market Leading Professional Services to the BVI

Walkers is pleased to announced that Walkers Professional Services (WPS) is expanding its operations to the British Virgin Islands.

Learn More

Walkers London Celebrates 20th Anniversary

Walkers is pleased to announce that its London office is celebrating its 20th anniversary.

Learn More

Walkers Tops Market Leading Rankings in Chambers Global Again

Walkers leads the way with 10 "Band 1" practice area rankings (out of a market leading 23 practice areas) and an overall "Band 1" ranking in 'Global Offshore'.

Learn More

Events & Webinars

See upcoming virtual events and webinars.

Read More

Walkers is a leading international law firm. We advise on the laws of Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Ireland and Jersey.
GlobalMap Oct2019

Diverse & Inclusive

At Walkers we are committed to building a diverse and inclusive workplace where everyone can feel comfortable, happy and confident in an inclusive environment.


Browse Professionals
by last name

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

Find a Professional
Search by one or more criteria

Walkers Advises Yili Group on its Privatization of China ZhongDi

Walkers acted as Cayman Islands counsel to Wholesome Harvest Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Company Limited, in its US$213 million privatization of the Hong Kong-listed China ZhongDi Dairy Holdings. Wholesome Harvest Limited made the mandatory conditional cash offer through CLSA Limited.

Walkers' team was led by Hong Kong partner Jo Lit and assisted by legal manager Beverly Lui.

Walkers Advises Nayuki Holdings Limited on Its HK$5.1 Billion IPO

Walkers acted as Cayman Islands counsel to Nayuki Holdings Limited in connection with its HK$5.1 billion (US$656 million) initial public offering and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

Nayuki Holdings is a leading premium modern teahouse chain in China that reshapes the tea drinking experience.  Nayuki Holdings Limited has become the first listed tea company in China.

Hong Kong partner Jo Lit and Senior Legal Manager Kevin Ho advised the Company on the Cayman Islands law aspects.  Other legal advisers include Davis Polk & Wardwell, Global Law Office, Kirkland & Ellis and Jingtian & Gongcheng.

Walkers Advises bolttech in Record Series A Financing

Walkers acted as Cayman Islands counsel to bolttech, one of the fastest growing international insurtech companies, in its US$180 million Series A funding round led by private investment firm Activant Capital Group.  The investment round is the largest series A round for an insurtech and values bolttech at more than US$1 billion, giving bolttech the insurtech unicorn status only one year after its launch in 2020.

Walkers' team was led by Singapore partner James Twigg and assisted by Hong Kong legal manager Ann Cheung.

Walkers (Cayman) acts for InSilico Medicine on $255 Million Series C Financing

Walkers (Cayman) is pleased to have acted as Cayman Islands counsel to InSilico Medicine in connection with its $255 Million Series C financing round.  Hong Kong-based InSilico is a global leader in end-to-end artificial intelligence for target discovery, small molecule chemistry and clinical development. Walkers is happy to continue its longstanding relationship in support of Insilico in this very important, impactful, and emerging field.

The Walkers team acted alongside Wilson Sonsini (Shanghai) and was led by Cayman Islands partner, Andrew Barker, with assistance from Jennifer Sangaroonthong (Associate) and Aoife Murphy (Associate).

"They Stand and Fall Together" - Privity of Interests in Recognition of Foreign Judgments

A recent decision of the BVI Court in an application to set aside an order for rectification of the register of a BVI company has wider implications for the recognition of foreign judgments in the BVI and the representation of companies in Commercial Court proceedings by individuals (including directors) who are not admitted in the BVI.

Rectification of the register of a BVI company and recognition of foreign judgments

In January 2021, in BVIHC (Com) 0188 of 2020, Justice Jack ordered the rectification of the register of Lenux Group Limited ("Lenux") having recognized the judgment of the English Court in proceedings brought by the claimants against, amongst others, Mr Sergei Pugachev, a Russian businessman and the beneficial owner of Lenux, and Miharo Limited, a New Zealand Company which the English Court determined held all of the shares in Lenux on behalf of Mr Pugachev (despite Mr Pugachev purportedly placing those assets into a discretionary trust for certain beneficiaries). The English court ordered Mr Pugachev and Miharo to effect the transfer of the shares in Lenux to the claimants but they failed to do so. The claimants sought a rectification of the register of Lenux pursuant to section 43 of the Business Companies Act and the principles set down in the case of Wanda Fong Jerrit et al v Meridian International Holdings Ltd et al BVIHCM2019/0135 (4 December 2019 and 4 June 2020 judgments).

Justice Jack held that whilst he did not consider that Miharo had submitted to the jurisdiction of the English Court (because there had been no positive act by Miharo showing that it had accepted the jurisdiction of the English Court), he was able to recognize the English judgment following the decision in House of Spring Gardens Ltd v Waite [1991] 1 QB 241 and applying the principles in Wonda Fong Jerrit. The Court found that Miharo (as trustee) and the beneficiaries shared a common interest in the English proceedings in establishing that there had been a proper discretionary trust and in defeating the claimants’ assertion that the trust assets were held on bare trust for Mr. Pugachev.  The BVI Court held that this was a quintessential example of privity of interest because Miharo had allowed the beneficiaries to argue its case and so "it is common sense that they stand and fall together". Justice Jack consequently ordered the rectification of the register of Lenux, but allowed Miharo a period of 35 days to apply to set aside that order.

Set aside applications and representation of companies

Miharo and Mr Pugachev both applied to set aside the rectification order, however neither appointed BVI legal practitioners to act on their behalf. At the hearing of the applications earlier this month, Mr Pugachev did not file submissions or appear. A director of Miharo attended the hearing and sought to appear on behalf of Miharo. The Claimants argued that Miharo must be represented by a legal practitioner, pursuant to CPR 69B.4(4) which provides that “bodies corporate must be represented by a legal practitioner in all commercial matters.” Justice Jack noted that this rule "appears to give the Court no discretion" but acknowledged that there may be some scope to relax the rule where it is absolutely necessary for a director to appear on behalf of a company, however, Miharo's director had failed to show such a case of necessity. Following the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Yao Juan v Kwok Kin Kwo & anr [2021] ECSCJ No 577 in the application of the Legal Practitioners Act 2015, Justice Jack held that it is "highly arguable" that the director was "practicing law" in contravention of the provisions of that act.

Ultimately, the BVI Court dismissed both set aside applications on the basis that no adequate grounds had been shown by either party to vary or discharge the rectification order.

Whilst the decision to recognize the judgment of the English Court and rectify the register of Lenux in order to enforce a significant money judgment against Mr Pugachev is on its face a straightforward one, the findings of the BVI Court both in respect of privity of interest in recognition proceedings and the commentary on non-BVI legal practitioners appearing for companies in commercial court proceedings have much wider implications for the jurisdiction. The decision should reassure creditors of the BVI Court's pragmatic approach to enforcement of foreign judgments.

The judgment of Justice Jack dated 14 January 2021 can be found here and the judgment of 23 June 2021 here

Murray Laing and Cate Barbour acted for the Claimants.

More Articles ...