Wei Ching Teo
Partner
Hong Kong
Nov 3, 2026

The Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI) continue to be the preferred investment hubs for these transactions, bringing legal certainty, tax neutrality and market familiarity to deals across Hong Kong and Singapore.
This article explains why Cayman Islands and BVI vehicles remain the popular choice for cornerstone investments; how they are typically structured and the key commercial and regulatory points to consider when selecting the right jurisdiction and entity type.
Managers and allocators choose these investment hubs because they offer:
Cornerstone investing is increasingly developing as a distinct investment strategy. For some time, managers have been establishing dedicated vehicles focused primarily on cornerstone investments, rather than treating cornerstone allocations as part of a broader equity investment strategy.
A widely used model is the single deal SPV, incorporated either in Cayman Islands or BVI, to hold a stake in the listing or private target.
This structure helps:
When managers choose BVI
When managers choose Cayman Islands
Managers frequently pool multiple investor participants into a single Cayman Islands or BVI aggregator to:
Depending on the structure, managers should ensure that the entity is appropriately registered with the regulator (as applicable) and complies with the requirements of the relevant investment hub.
Cornerstone allocations typically impose:
Cayman Islands and BVI corporate statutes allow these restrictions to be:
Because listing sponsors and banks in Hong Kong and Singapore are familiar with Cayman Islands and BVI vehicles, these structures make it easier for managers to align with placing guidelines, disclosure requirements, controlling shareholder restrictions and "public float" preservation.
Both investment hubs also offer robust common law protection against foreign judgments and hostile claims, often a decisive point for sovereign wealth funds, corporate strategic investors, and family offices participating as cornerstone investors.
Depending on the structure, a cornerstone SPV may need to comply with the following requirements:
Managers should ensure timely filings, accurate classification, and designated contact persons to avoid administrative penalties.
The table below highlights certain key characteristics of the Cayman Islands and BVI which may be relevant in determining where to set up a vehicle for a cornerstone investment.
| Factor | Cayman Islands | BVI |
| Investor profile | Institutional, sovereign, regulated funds | Emerging managers, single‑asset investors |
| Regulatory environment | CIMA oversight (where applicable), robust regulatory oversight | Light‑touch, company‑focused |
| Speed and cost | Slightly higher cost depending on structure; quick | Fastest and more cost‑efficient |
| Complexity of structure | Best for multi‑tier funds, AIVs, ELPs, SPCs | Best for SPVs and simple holding structures |
| Market perception | 'Gold standard' for funds | Popular for co‑investments and SPVs |
Cayman Islands and BVI structures remain central to international investment structures for cornerstone transactions.
Their combination of tax neutrality, legal certainty, structuring flexibility and international acceptance gives managers and allocators the certainty they need when navigating fast-moving, complex cross border opportunities.
Whether deploying a single deal SPV, establishing a managed account platform or integrating cornerstone allocations into fund structures, Cayman Islands and BVI vehicles continue to provide stability and optionality for institutional investors.
Authors
Senior Associate/Hong Kong
Key contacts